Since antiquity, observers have read character from the geometry of the face. Triangula continues that conversation — not as a verdict, but as a mirror with sixteen reflections.
The method grew out of many years of observation and comparison. By studying thousands of faces alongside the lives behind them, a stable pattern emerged: human character tends to settle into a small number of recognizable orientations. These were systematized into sixteen archetypes — three core casts (Leader, Partner, Analyst) and the ways they blend and tilt.
Two readings happen at once. First, the geometry: the proportions of face, nose and mouth — measured within the photograph. Then the lived answers: a short set of questions about how you actually move through a day. Where the two agree, the reading is confident; where they diverge, it stays honest.
The test uses a 68-landmark model to estimate facial geometry from a photograph. These measurements contribute to an interpretive archetype reading alongside your answers; the shared landmark layout does not establish equal accuracy across ages or population groups.
The printable report offers three starting points for reflection:
Explore your profile. Your archetype and dimension scores, with strengths and blind spots to reflect on.
Consider selected comparisons. Selected archetype comparisons for business, romantic and family contexts. These comparisons are interpretive, not predictions about a particular person.
Reflect on work and growth. Career suggestions associated with your archetype and a brief reflection on personal growth.
The sixteen archetypes are interpretive lenses, not rankings or fixed labels. Use the reading as a starting point for reflection, not a verdict about yourself or others.
The method was built by Sergius G., engineer-researcher in non-verbal archetypes. How the method came together → · What the method does, and what it doesn't →
